--- kdelibs-3.2.2/configure.in.in~	2004-02-13 16:56:32 +0300

+++ kdelibs-3.2.2/configure.in.in	2004-02-13 16:56:45 +0300

@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@

 AC_MSG_RESULT($kde_distribution_text)

 kde_have_utempter=yes

-AC_CHECK_LIB(utempter, addToUtmp, [LIBUTEMPTER=-lutempter], kde_have_utempter=no)

+AC_CHECK_LIB(utempter, utempter_add_record, [LIBUTEMPTER=-lutempter], kde_have_utempter=no)

 AC_SUBST(LIBUTEMPTER)

 if test "$kde_have_utempter" = "yes"; then

   AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(HAVE_UTEMPTER, 1, [Define if you have the utempter helper for utmp managment])

--- kdelibs-3.2.2/kdecore/Makefile.am~	2004-02-13 16:54:30 +0300

+++ kdelibs-3.2.2/kdecore/Makefile.am	2004-02-13 16:54:59 +0300

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@

 	kuser.cpp kconfigskeleton.cpp kconfigdialogmanager.cpp

 libkdecore_la_LDFLAGS = $(QT_LDFLAGS) $(KDE_RPATH) $(KDE_MT_LDFLAGS) $(X_LDFLAGS) $(USER_LDFLAGS) -version-info 6:0:2 -no-undefined

-libkdecore_la_LIBADD = malloc/libklmalloc.la $(SVGICON_LIB) ../dcop/libDCOP.la ../libltdl/libltdlc.la $(LIB_XEXT) $(LIBRESOLV) $(LIBUTIL) $(LIBART_LIBS) ../kdefx/libkdefx.la -lidn

+libkdecore_la_LIBADD = malloc/libklmalloc.la $(SVGICON_LIB) ../dcop/libDCOP.la ../libltdl/libltdlc.la $(LIB_XEXT) $(LIBRESOLV) $(LIBUTIL) $(LIBART_LIBS) ../kdefx/libkdefx.la -lidn  $(LIBUTEMPTER)

 libkdecore_la_NMCHECK = $(srcdir)/libkdecore.nmcheck

 libkdecore_la_NMCHECKWEAK = $(srcdir)/libkdecore_weak.nmcheck $(srcdir)/libqt-mt_weak.nmcheck \

 	$(top_srcdir)/dcop/libDCOP_weak.nmcheck $(top_srcdir)/kdecore/standard_weak.nmcheck

--- kdelibs-3.2.2/kdecore/kpty.cpp~	2004-05-14 12:21:52 +0400

+++ kdelibs-3.2.2/kdecore/kpty.cpp	2004-05-14 12:24:54 +0400

@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ extern "C" {

 // private functions //

 ///////////////////////

+#if 0

 #ifdef HAVE_UTEMPTER

 class KProcess_Utmp : public KProcess

 {

@@ -153,7 +154,11 @@ public:

 #endif

 #define BASE_CHOWN "kgrantpty"

-

+#endif

+#ifdef HAVE_UTEMPTER

+#include <utempter.h>

+#include <sys/param.h>

+#endif

 //////////////////

@@ -195,6 +200,18 @@ KPty::~KPty()

 bool KPty::open()

 {

+  if (d->masterFd >= 0) return true;

+

+  char *n = new char[64];

+  int ret = ::openpty(&d->masterFd, &d->slaveFd, n, NULL, NULL);

+  if( ret < 0 )

+  {

+    perror("openpty");

+    return false;

+  }

+  d->ttyName = QCString(n);

+

+#if 0 //old code

   if (d->masterFd >= 0)

     return true;

@@ -309,6 +326,8 @@ bool KPty::open()

   ioctl(d->slaveFd, I_PUSH, "ldterm");

 #endif

+#endif // old code

+

     // set xon/xoff & control keystrokes

   // without the '::' some version of HP-UX thinks, this declares

   // the struct in this class, in this method, and fails to find 

@@ -387,10 +406,7 @@ void KPty::setCTty()

 void KPty::login(const char *user, const char *remotehost)

 {

 #ifdef HAVE_UTEMPTER

-    KProcess_Utmp utmp;

-    utmp.cmdFd = d->masterFd;

-    utmp << "/usr/sbin/utempter" << "-a" << d->ttyName << "";

-    utmp.start(KProcess::Block);

+    utempter_add_record( d->masterFd, remotehost);

     Q_UNUSED(user);

     Q_UNUSED(remotehost);

 #elif defined(USE_LOGIN)

@@ -430,10 +446,7 @@ void KPty::login(const char *user, const

 void KPty::logout()

 {

 #ifdef HAVE_UTEMPTER

-    KProcess_Utmp utmp;

-    utmp.cmdFd = d->masterFd;

-    utmp << "/usr/sbin/utempter" << "-d" << d->ttyName;

-    utmp.start(KProcess::Block);

+    utempter_remove_added_record();

 #elif defined(USE_LOGIN)

     const char *str_ptr = d->ttyName.data();

     if (!memcmp(str_ptr, "/dev/", 5))

@@ -495,8 +508,11 @@ int KPty::slaveFd() const

 // private

 bool KPty::chownpty(bool grant)

 {

+  return true;

+#if 0

   KProcess proc;

   proc << locate("exe", BASE_CHOWN) << (grant?"--grant":"--revoke") << QString::number(d->masterFd);

   return proc.start(KProcess::Block) && proc.normalExit() && !proc.exitStatus();

+#endif

 }